Guides must use either Reddit or Imgur as an image hostĥ. Nonserious/Comedy Guides Will Be Removed (better suited for /r/shittycoolguides)Ĥ. Please only post direct links to images of type. If you have questions message us, if you think a post is not a good one downvote it.ġ.
CONSPIRACY ICEBERG WENDIGOON MOD
These are the considerations the mod team use when they feel it is appropriate to remove posts. Sometimes infographics can masquerade as how-to guides. If your guide is more of a visual essay than a structured table or list, then chances are that is an infographic. Flow charts and step-by-step guides are considered guides, so are visual references that line up different types of something next to one another other.Īn infographic is more educational in layout and content, finding something specific on an infographic is not as easy because it is designed to inform through more narrative structures. Guides are typically laid out in a grid configuration of some sort or sectioned into multiple tables by a category or step of a process. On top of that not all guides are created equal, many technically qualify as guides, but lack substance. If someone has to visually bop around your guide to find what they are looking for, the guide does not pass the layout test. The layout or structure of a guide must be that so, when someone is trying to find/reference information from the guide, they can do so logically or simply. It takes both content and layout to make something a guide. Guides are reference materials, how-tos, and/or comparison tables.
CONSPIRACY ICEBERG WENDIGOON HOW TO
For example, "A cool guide about identifying poison ivy", "A cool guide showing how to clean your house", or "A cool guide for painting your living room". Sometimes the "I don't want to ruin the magic" seem to veer into "I'll just spread a bit of misinformation not to ruin the magic", or "I'll just omit this reasonable explanation easily researched not to ruin the magic", kind no bueno.To help keep things nice, searchable, and maintainable, all posts must be prefixed with "A cool guide". There'd be other ways to "prop up" our perception of their power.Īlso "Accelerationism" isn't just to "accelerate" any system, as far as I've understood it's specifically minded towards capitalism with both left-wingers, and right-wingers having some representatives of accelerationism (starting with Nick Land at the University of Warwicks CCRU, building on Guattari and Deleuze). This would require an enormous effort to fake many years of fertility measure and census data that simply doesn't make much sense. I don't see it in any way plausible that China is skewing their population numbers by 500 million. measuring modern applianced in order to account for the population in China because "They must be lying to prop up our perception of their power" is on the one hand, believeable but depending on the purpose and the lense of analysis misleading. It's weird how he doesn't mention this, because you absolutely cannot do any research on hermeneutics without encountering sites about the modern application.Īgain, really good and entertaining videos, but I'd wish they where more critical of the iceberg (both in terms of what is and isn't conspiracies, and which of the conspiracies we know stuff about)Įdit: Also "Malta, Italy" made me chuckle as a EuropeanĢnd Edit: Watching more of the conspiracy videos, and more weird stuff pops up. The way Wendigoon presents it is pretty much only the more "spiritual" way of understanding the concept, and not at all how it's applied in academia today. Whether or not you agree with the method as an analytical tool is not my place to decide, but it's most certainly not a "conspiracy theory". While it is true that some form of Hermeneutics dates back to biblical times, the way in which most academics use hermeneutics nowadays follow in the footsteps of Heidegger, Schleiermacher, and Gadamer and emphazises a) the relationship between the whole of a text and its parts, and b) the circular motion of interpretation and understanding. It is very much not JUST biblical ways of interpreting texts.
Well I'm not here to nitpick everything, just set the record slightly more straight regarding Hermeneutics. I mean things such as the 6th extinction or the "Holocene extinction" isn't a conspiracy theory you may agree or disagree but I think calling it a conspiracy theory would be wrong. Some of them also just straight up aren't conspiracy theories. Most of the "conspiracies" really just seem to be "Wack things people believe", and not really ideas about groups of people conspiring to do "x". First off, great videos I'm really enjoying them although I honestly think the "iceberg" itself is pretty.
0 kommentar(er)
